COMMON REASON FOR REJECTION OF DOs II AT LEDGER GROUPS LEVEL
- “From date” is not mentioned within AL/TD period in DOs II with regard to “ABF”.
INTRODUCTION 7 - Unit code is not mentioned under column 7C of DOs II in case of “POSOUT”.
- Copy of Station Order is not enclosed in case SRA is granted for more than 10 days.
- Reference Part II orders not mentioned whenever it is required to be mentioned. For example, in case of
REJAL/REJCL/FINE/ABF, etc. - Date of Journey is mentioned in column 7a & 7b with description “PRPLVE”, whereas it should be left blank.
- Rates are not mentioned as per enlistment of city in DOs II with description “CILQ/TPTL/ DAILY ALLOWANCES
etc”. - DOs II regarding TFRDEP/ REVDEP/ TFRIN/ TFROUT, etc. is not submitted within the stipulated period resulting into heavy credit/debit balances.
- DOsII are published for ‘ENCASH’ (10 days) without confirmation that journey for LTC has been performed. Place of visit is also not mentioned in the Part II order.
- It is seen that period of encashment is also included in journey period.
- CEA is admissible only for first and second child, but DOs II are published by the unit authorities in respect of
third/fourth child also. - In respect of SCCIA Column 7b of DOs II should not be left blank, but it is left blank in many cases.
- DOs II for FAA are not admissible to JCNOs, but DOs II are still published in this regard.
- Some descriptions like ATCORR etc. are not concerned Some descriptions like ATCORR etc. are not concerned with units, but DOs II are published on this account.
- Column 7c of Part II order, with description ‘POSOUT’, should be filled with POSIN unit code, but it is left blank
(POSIN unit code should be mentioned).